Reflections from a Young Movie-goer
After watching and loving Roman
Polanski's 1965 psychological horror Repulsion, I was more
than excited to see his more well known film Rosemary's Baby.
Its a title frequently thrown around when the subject of “best
horror” comes up, along with the likes of The Shining, The
Exorcist and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, all three of
which I thoroughly enjoyed. Horror is perhaps one of the most
versatile (and definitely visceral) genres in cinema, as well as one
of the most accessible. Its role is to play on the common-held fears
of mankind. Therefore it is one of the most inclusive modes of
storytelling. One could argue that there are many other types of film
which do a similar thing, but, to me, horror is the most profound.
Horror can be loud or quiet, terrifyingly abstract or dreadfully
real, political or personal. It gives the film maker an excuse to
explore their inner-most selves without seeming self-indulgent. The
more we explore the dark and depraved world through the lens, the
more we can see its depth and beauty in real life. Furthermore fear
is active as an emotion, it doesn't need an enormous intellect to be
understood but it can lead one into deep thought. Horror is also a
response to every other genre. Take Ben Wheatley's Kill List,
for instance, which starts out as a socially realistic domestic drama
before taking a complete turn into horror. Rosemary's Baby
does a similar thing but with much more nuance.
Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PewtQsgN5uo
Its plot follows a young couple,
Rosemary played by Mia Farrow and Guy played by John Cassavetes, who
move into an old apartment in New York city. A friend of theirs,
called Hutch, warns them against moving in to the apartment and tells
them about its sordid history. Their neighbours include a nosy and
eccentric elderly couple whom they unintentionally start socialising
with. The elderly couple start involving themselves a lot in the
young couple's lives, giving Rosemary a charm containing “Tannis
root” and, on one night, a dessert to eat when they're planning on
conceiving a child. After noting that the dessert has a strange
undertaste, Rosemary passes out and dreams she is raped by a devil as
all of her neighbours, standing naked, look on. From here on a number
of complications start to arise. As the due date, June 28th
1966 (hint hint hint) approaches, her health deteriorates and she
falls into madness, learning that her neighbours are possibly witches
who wish to take her baby for Satanic purposes.
The
film works as a horror because it keeps the audience questioning
Rosemary's speculations and her perspective; Is
it going to be a psychological or a supernatural horror?
I find films almost always scarier when the viewer is uncertain as to
what they are actually scared of. This is something I've explored in
other reflections (see Videodrome
and Under
the Skin
reviews). Though I didn't find it nearly as scary or meaningful as
Repulsion,
which is far more visceral, raw and psychologically shocking as a
horror film. The eeriness of Rosemary's
Baby
lies in its absurdism, the bizarre lurking beneath the every day.
But, overall, it has far less effect today than the other's punchy
realism. Its higher budget and bigger story roots it more in the 60s,
and this makes many of the dramatic and comic aspects of the plot
fail because of their datedness. Yet, with many of the narrative
tropes of horror combined with the aesthetics of a drama, it has an
impressive sophistication in its plot, drawing more on the eery
rather than the scary. This is what gives it its nuance in comparison
to something like Kill
List,
which channels one genre then the other.
There
are many similarities in the progression between Repulsion
to Rosemary's
Baby
and Jean Cocteau's two films The
Blood of a Poet and
Orphée.
The director has explored similar themes, but their first is a lot
more weird and visceral (almost more so for its age and lower
budget), while the second has a bigger budget, a wider story and is
more rooted in the canon of popular film. I think that both films for
both directors are good in different ways, but in both instances I
got more out of their first films.
But
there were several parts to Rosemary's
Baby
I really enjoyed, which all stick out against the datedness of some
of the other parts. The use of space and lighting in all the interior
shots was incredibly atmospheric, adding more to the sense of
eeriness than most of the characters. The visual motif of one room
viewed from another. The sound of a ticking clock. All of these were
utilised to similar effect in Repulsion,
and are developed perfectly here. Polanski's approach to shooting
interiors must have influenced Stanley Kubrick in The
Shining
in some way. Another performance I really liked was Guy's, which
paralleled the uncanniness of the apartment through both his distance
and his familiarity. The notion of the bizarre lurking underneath the
everyday is most expressed through the apartment and Guy, drawing
attention to the status of marriage and the home. Polanski is really
exploring how these can turn against the woman, as well as
questioning maternal duty. There is an interesting subtext to the
film, which makes repeat viewings much desirable. At least Rosemary's
Baby
has this over Repulsion,
which one can understand more completely the first time around.
Usually
I'm not too keen on remakes, unless they are also reinventions. I was
sad to hear that Nicolas Roeg's masterpiece Don't
Look Now is
being remade, which, if this were to happen, would lose a lot of its
power. Yet, I feel as if I would welcome a remake of
Rosemary's Baby,
if put in the right hands. This is mainly because I felt the
effectiveness of the plot against its datedness was jarring in
places. As I have said before, some films attain a vintage quality
with age where their oldness becomes charming. But in the case of
this film, I think it tarnishes some of its desired effect. The most
recent film I could think of which bears some resemblance is Lars Von
Trier's Antichrist,
which is definitely worth checking out for those interested in seeing
something that explores similar themes of madness, marriage and
maternal grief. Its also quite scary.
Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PewtQsgN5uo
No comments:
Post a Comment